<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rampler #367 (8/26/09)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therampler.com/archives/254/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therampler.com/archives/254</link>
	<description>A Pleasantly Insane Talk Show Experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 04:23:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rampler</title>
		<link>http://therampler.com/archives/254/comment-page-1#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Rampler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therampler.com/?p=254#comment-202</guid>
		<description>The definition of &quot;decades&quot; in this case is the more casual sense, which is in common usage. &quot;The Eighties&quot;, for example, began January 1, 1980 and ended December 31, 1989.

If you were counting decades, you might say that the &quot;199th Decade&quot; began January 1, 1981 and ended December 31, 1990.

However, the decade system that is in use these days is the more casual system and not the more formalized system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The definition of &#8220;decades&#8221; in this case is the more casual sense, which is in common usage. &#8220;The Eighties&#8221;, for example, began January 1, 1980 and ended December 31, 1989.</p>
<p>If you were counting decades, you might say that the &#8220;199th Decade&#8221; began January 1, 1981 and ended December 31, 1990.</p>
<p>However, the decade system that is in use these days is the more casual system and not the more formalized system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Jude</title>
		<link>http://therampler.com/archives/254/comment-page-1#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Jude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therampler.com/?p=254#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Hate to disagree with you Frank, but decades, centuries and millennia ARE in accord with each other. They all start on the &quot;1&quot; of each grouping, thus, January 1, 2001 was the first day of a new decade, a new century and a new millennium.

1980, 1990, 2000 and 2010 are all a part of the decades that precede them. 

Our next new decade shall begin on January 1, 2011.

The logic is thus: Although the current Gregorian calendar was not adopted until 1582, it&#039;s retroactive factor traces back to a first year, being the year 1, so the first decade was 1 - 10, the first century 1 - 100, and the first millennia 1 - 1000. Neither the Gregorian, nor the previous Julian calendars have a &quot;Year 0&quot; which would have been the first year, so decades, centuries and millennia all start on the &quot;1&quot; year.

Looking forward to a Ramplerful week next week!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to disagree with you Frank, but decades, centuries and millennia ARE in accord with each other. They all start on the &#8220;1&#8243; of each grouping, thus, January 1, 2001 was the first day of a new decade, a new century and a new millennium.</p>
<p>1980, 1990, 2000 and 2010 are all a part of the decades that precede them. </p>
<p>Our next new decade shall begin on January 1, 2011.</p>
<p>The logic is thus: Although the current Gregorian calendar was not adopted until 1582, it&#8217;s retroactive factor traces back to a first year, being the year 1, so the first decade was 1 &#8211; 10, the first century 1 &#8211; 100, and the first millennia 1 &#8211; 1000. Neither the Gregorian, nor the previous Julian calendars have a &#8220;Year 0&#8243; which would have been the first year, so decades, centuries and millennia all start on the &#8220;1&#8243; year.</p>
<p>Looking forward to a Ramplerful week next week!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roel</title>
		<link>http://therampler.com/archives/254/comment-page-1#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Roel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therampler.com/?p=254#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Enjoy your Rampler Free week !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoy your Rampler Free week !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek J</title>
		<link>http://therampler.com/archives/254/comment-page-1#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 05:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therampler.com/?p=254#comment-193</guid>
		<description>I was actually playing an online version of Mastermind during my very first listen to the Overnightscape in early 2009! It was at a very basic game site, mah-jongg.ch. I see there are two versions now; “Mastermind II” must have been put on there sometime in the past couple of months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was actually playing an online version of Mastermind during my very first listen to the Overnightscape in early 2009! It was at a very basic game site, mah-jongg.ch. I see there are two versions now; “Mastermind II” must have been put on there sometime in the past couple of months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
