<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rampler #363 (8/24/09)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therampler.com/archives/243/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therampler.com/archives/243</link>
	<description>A Pleasantly Insane Talk Show Experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 04:23:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rampler</title>
		<link>http://therampler.com/archives/243/comment-page-1#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Rampler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therampler.com/?p=243#comment-184</guid>
		<description>10GB a month? that&#039;s rough... I know a lot of people have bandwidth caps... so downloading and seeding an 80GB torrent would be impossible...

Right now, a 16GB flash drive (for the &quot;lite&quot; version of OnsugBox) would be about $30... with prices dropping all the time. I&#039;m sure an 80GB flash drive for $30 can&#039;t be far off...

I think you&#039;re right - this decade can just called the 2000s... but the next one is trickier...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10GB a month? that&#8217;s rough&#8230; I know a lot of people have bandwidth caps&#8230; so downloading and seeding an 80GB torrent would be impossible&#8230;</p>
<p>Right now, a 16GB flash drive (for the &#8220;lite&#8221; version of OnsugBox) would be about $30&#8230; with prices dropping all the time. I&#8217;m sure an 80GB flash drive for $30 can&#8217;t be far off&#8230;</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re right &#8211; this decade can just called the 2000s&#8230; but the next one is trickier&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://therampler.com/archives/243/comment-page-1#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therampler.com/?p=243#comment-182</guid>
		<description>I think the market segment you were having trouble naming might be &quot;Nascar Dads&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the market segment you were having trouble naming might be &#8220;Nascar Dads&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek J</title>
		<link>http://therampler.com/archives/243/comment-page-1#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therampler.com/?p=243#comment-181</guid>
		<description>I might pick up a flash drive for the Onsug Box. My hard drive is only 74 gigs, and bandwidth is currently limited to 10 gig/month, so a torrent is out of the question!

As for decade naming, I just use “the 2000’s” to describe this decade, and “the 2000-tens” or “the twenty-tens” to describe the next one. That doesn’t really work for the decade after that, “the twenty-twenties” just kind of sounds stupid…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might pick up a flash drive for the Onsug Box. My hard drive is only 74 gigs, and bandwidth is currently limited to 10 gig/month, so a torrent is out of the question!</p>
<p>As for decade naming, I just use “the 2000’s” to describe this decade, and “the 2000-tens” or “the twenty-tens” to describe the next one. That doesn’t really work for the decade after that, “the twenty-twenties” just kind of sounds stupid…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
